Fidelity Opens 10 ETFs November 8, 2013 Adviser Fund Update Print Fidelity Unveils Sector ETFsA type of security which allows investors to indirectly invest in an underlying basket of financial instruments (these may include stocks, bonds, commodities or other types of instruments). Shares in an ETF are publicly traded on an exchange, and the price of an ETF’s shares will fluctuate throughout the trading day (traditional mutual funds trade only once a day). For example, one popular ETF tracks the companies in the S&P 500, so buying a share of the ETF gets an investor exposure to all 500 companies in the index. On October 24, Fidelity launched a suite of 10 sector ETFs, which are in direct competition with very similar offerings from Vanguard. With expense ratios of 0.12%, the new ETFs became the lowest-cost passively managed sector ETFs in the industry. Investors can purchase the ETFs commission-free through the firm’s online brokerage platforms. The ETFs represent the latest volley in the long-running fee war between Fidelity and Vanguard. This time, it’s Fidelity striking a blow, as the new ETFs each charge less in expenses than the comparable offerings from Vanguard. You can see how they match up in the table below. Both sets of ETFs track MSCI indexes, however, only the two telecom ETFs share an identical underlying index. The rest track similar, but distinct versions of their sectors’ index. The differences lie in the fact that Vanguard made the switch in early 2010 to the “25/50” versions of MSCI’s sector indexes, which are designed so that no more than 25% of assets are invested in a single stockA financial instrument giving the holder a proportion of the ownership and earnings of a company. and the allocation to all stocksA financial instrument giving the holder a proportion of the ownership and earnings of a company. representing more than 5% of the index each do not exceed 50% of total assets. The 25/50 indexes were adopted to keep the ETFs from violating SEC diversificationA strategy for managing investment risk by investing in a mixture of different investments. Since different asset classes face different risks, even if one type of asset declines in value, others may not. rules. For now, Fidelity and its sector ETFA type of security which allows investors to indirectly invest in an underlying basket of financial instruments (these may include stocks, bonds, commodities or other types of instruments). Shares in an ETF are publicly traded on an exchange, and the price of an ETF’s shares will fluctuate throughout the trading day (traditional mutual funds trade only once a day). For example, one popular ETF tracks the companies in the S&P 500, so buying a share of the ETF gets an investor exposure to all 500 companies in the index. sub-advisor BlackRock (which owns the iShares line of ETFs) have chosen to mostly avoid the 25/50 versions of MSCI’s sector indexes. From one perspective, Fidelity’s product launch is a bit of a head-scratcher, strategically. Fidelity already offers a wide range of actively managed Select sector funds, which cost significantly more and could bleed assets into the cheaper passive sector ETFs. Have the fee wars between Fidelity and Vanguard grown so heated that the firm is willing cannibalize some of its established offerings as a way to undercut Vanguard? Its seems like that might be the case—in a recent conference call, Fidelity said that the ETFs will meet the needs of investors interested in intraday trading and the indexing approach, while the older, actively managed Select fund lineup should appeal more to those with a longer investment horizonThe length of time that an investor expects to hold an asset.. The new ETFs might lure investors away from Fidelity’s Select funds, but their introduction brings the potential of greater overall assets under management. ETFs have exploded in assets since their advent, and Fidelity wants to finally get on the field after sitting on the sidelines for more than a decade. “We are not building an at-scale passive ETF business,” Anthony Rochte, head of Fidelity’s sector-investing unit, told Barron’s. “Frankly, we’re trying to meet the needs of our customers.” Fee Wars Hit Sector ETFs ETF Name Ticker Expense Ratio Comparable Vanguard ETF Expenses Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF FDIS 0.12% 0.14% Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF FSTA 0.12% 0.14% Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF FENY 0.12% 0.14% Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF FNCL 0.12% 0.19% Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF FHLC 0.12% 0.14% Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF FIDU 0.12% 0.14% Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF FTEC 0.12% 0.14% Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF FMAT 0.12% 0.14% Fidelity MSCI Telecommunications Services Index ETF FCOM 0.12% 0.14% Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF FUTY 0.12% 0.14% Sources: Fidelity, Vanguard. While the introduction of low-cost funds benefits investors, we feel it’s important to remember that sector investing is risky. Whether you pick an actively managed sector fund or an index-based sector ETF, you are making a bet on a narrow slice of the market, one which could see considerably greater volatilityA measure of how large the changes in an asset’s price are. The more volatile an asset, the more likely that its price will experience sharp rises and steep drops over time. The more volatile an asset is, the riskier it is to invest in. than a diversified investment. We think Fidelity’s sector ETFs hold limited appeal for most individual investors, but would not be surprised to see them gain some assets as institutional investors gravitate to their lower expenses. Vanguard’s Fixed-Income Chief Retiring Following the lead of former fixed-income head Ian MacKinnon, who retired in June 2003 at the age of 55, Bob Auwaerter, 58, is stepping down March 2014. His replacement, Greg Davis, will only be Vanguard’s third fixed-income chief. We do not believe Vanguard fixed-income investors will see any noticeable impact on their funds. Auwaerter leaves behind a deep and broad bench of analysts and portfolio managers and he handed over active management duties to Greg Nassour years ago. Davis is currently Vanguard’s chief investment officer in the Asia Pacific region and also serves as director of Vanguard Investments Australia. He’s been with Vanguard since 1999, and not too long ago served as a portfolio manager and the head of bondA financial instrument representing an IOU from the borrower to the lender. Bond issuers promise to pay bond holders a given amount of interest for a pre-determined amount of time until the loan is repaid in full (otherwise known as the maturity date). Bonds can have a fixed or floating interest rate. Fixed-rate bonds pay out a pre-determined amount of interest each year, while floating-rate bonds can pay higher or lower interest each year depending on prevailing market interest rates. indexing in Vanguard’s Fixed Income Group, experiences which should benefit him when he takes over the entire division next year. Vanguard International Growth Manager Departs Virginnie Maisonneuve, who was the lead manager on Schroder Investment Management’s portion of the Vanguard International Growth fund, is decamping for PIMCO at the end of the year to become that firm’s global head of equitiesThe amount of money that would be returned to shareholders if a company’s assets were sold off and all its debt repaid. and a portfolio manager (Vanguard has already removed her name from the fund’s page on its website). Maisonneuve took over for veteran Richard Foulkes upon his retirement in 2005 as lead manager on Schroders’ piece of International Growth. At the time, Schroders managed a bit more than 70% of the fund’s $11.5 billion in assets. More recently, Maisonneuve and co-manager Simon Webber (who was added to the fund in 2009 and has taken over as lead manager) were running less than 40% of the $21.2 billion asset base, or about the same $8 billion Schroders was responsible for when Maisonneuve first took the reins. Managers from M&G Investment Management and Baillie Gifford manage the 60%-plus of assets in International Growth not under Schroders’ control. Maisonneuve is a talented portfolio manager—one who we’ve had the chance to speak with a number of times over the years—but we don’t see her departure from International Growth as a cause for concern for current investors. About Adviser Investments Adviser Investments operates as an independent, professional wealth management firm with expertise in Fidelity and Vanguard funds, actively managed mutual funds, ETFs, fixed-income investing, tactical strategies and financial planning. Our investment professionals focus on helping individual investors, trusts, foundations and institutions meet their investment goals. Our minimum account size is $350,000. For the fifth consecutive year, Adviser Investments was named to Barron’s list of the top 100 independent financial advisers nationwide and its list of the top advisory firms in Massachusetts in 2017. We have also been recognized on the Financial Times 300 Top Registered Investment Advisers list in 2014, 2015 and 2016. For more information, please visit www.adviserinvestments.com or call 800-492-6868. Disclaimer: This material is distributed for informational purposes only. The investment ideas and expressions of opinion may contain certain forward-looking statements and should not be viewed as recommendations, personal investment advice or considered an offer to buy or sell specific securities. Data and statistics contained in this report are obtained from what we believe to be reliable sources; however, their accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Our statements and opinions are subject to change without notice and should be considered only as part of a diversified portfolio. You may request a free copy of the firm’s Form ADV Part 2, which describes, among other items, riskThe probability that an investment will decline in value in the short term, along with the magnitude of that decline. Stocks are often considered riskier than bonds because they have a higher probability of losing money, and they tend to lose more than bonds when they do decline. factors, strategies, affiliations, services offered and fees charged. Past performance is not an indication of future returns. The tax information contained herein is general in nature, is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. We do not provide legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. The Barron’s rankings consider factors such as assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, quality of practice and philanthropic work. This award does not consider client experience and is not indicative of future performance. Editors at the Financial Times bestowed “elite” status on 300 firms in the U.S., as determined by assets under management, asset growth, longevity, compliance record, industry certifications and online accessibility. © 2018 Adviser Investments, LLC. All Rights Reserved.