Home Guides & Resources chevron_right Investing Vanguard Doesn’t Solve Multi-Manager Problem With Latest Manager Swap Published October 3, 2019 Changing a fund manager can’t always change the dynamic. And we’re confident that the latest turnover at Vanguard’s $44.4 billion Windsor II fund is unlikely to overcome its fatal flaw: Too many cooks in the stock-picking kitchen. Windsor II, the mega-sized large-cap value fund with 10 managers at the helm, has lagged behind its benchmark and Vanguard’s own Value Index fund consistently since going “multi-manager” many years ago. Last week, Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss (BHMS), a sub-adviser on Windsor II, announced that Jeff Fahrenbruch would be replaced on the fund by Mark Giambrone. Will Giambrone be the one to get Windsor II off the schneid? Barrow Hanley, which was running 39% of the fund as of its last semiannual report, shares management responsibility with Lazard Asset Management, Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management, Sanders Capital and Vanguard’s in-house quantitative management group. That adds up to 10 managers from five sub-advisers running pieces of the portfolio. We’d joke about investors getting a good price on managers with shares in the fund, but the fund’s track record of late has been no laughing matter for shareholders. Value investing (a style that emphasizes paying less for something than the buyer thinks it is worth) has struggled to keep pace with growth investing (a strategy that banks on profit growth over asset values in determining a company’s worth) since the Great Recession. But that alone doesn’t explain Windsor II’s decade-long woes. The chart below tells the tale. Windsor II has put up a woeful performance against Vanguard’s 500 Index fund (which mimics the S&P 500 index). As we said, value stocksA stock that is statistically cheap as a multiple of its earnings or book value, as compared to the overall stock market. have lagged growth stocksA stock whose issuing company is expected to grow at a significantly higher rate than the market., so that’s no huge surprise. But it’s also trailed two large-cap value benchmarks in the Russell 1000 Value Index and Vanguard’s Value Index fund. Why invest in Windsor II to get worse than index-like returns while paying active management fees? No, thanks. Note: Chart shows relative change in value of an investment in Vanguard Windsor II compared to an investment in the comparison fund or index. A rising line indicates outperformance for Windsor II; a falling line shows outperformance by the comparison fund or index. Chart covers period from 2/28/09 through 9/30/19. Source: Morningstar Direct. Giambrone—who also manages a portion of Vanguard Selected Value—has got all the trappings of a star manager, but as BHMS’ portion of the Windsor II portfolio continues to decline, no matter how brightly he shines, his impact will be watered down. We’d joke about investors getting a good price on managers with shares in the fund, but the fund’s track record of late has been no laughing matter for shareholders. Vanguard claims that stacking multiple sub-advisers on a fund tempers manager riskThe probability that an investment will decline in value in the short term, along with the magnitude of that decline. Stocks are often considered riskier than bonds because they have a higher probability of losing money, and they tend to lose more than bonds when they do decline., insulating against the possibility of a single manager severely underperforming and dragging an entire portfolio down with them. The fund giant would also assert that it protects against a fund being radically altered by the retirement of a single manager—that’s something Windsor II shareholders can rest easy about at night, to be fair. (These factors are part of the reason why our research team spends so much time talking to fund managers and reviewing their portfolios. It means we always have high-confidence backups at the ready in case a preferred fund manager decides to hang it up, loses a step or their fund closes to our clients.) At Adviser Investments, we buy the manager, not the fund. We stand by our time-tested approach to investing in active managers with a long-term track record of strong risk-adjusted returns over full market cycles. We let them do what they do best. In our eyes, it makes no sense to dilute the impact of true, verifiable investment talent. Disclaimer: This material is distributed for informational purposes only. The investment ideas and opinions contained herein should not be viewed as recommendations or personal investment advice or considered an offer to buy or sell specific securities. Our statements and opinions are subject to change at any time, without notice and should be considered only as part of a diversified portfolio. Mutual funds and exchange-traded funds mentioned herein are not necessarily held in client portfolios. Data and statistics contained in this report are obtained from what we believe to be reliable sources; however, their accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. You may request a free copy of the firm’s Form ADV Part 2A, which describes, among other items, risk factors, strategies, affiliations, services offered and fees charged. Past performance is not an indication of future returns. We do not provide legal or tax advice, nor sell insurance products. Tax, legal and insurance information contained herein is general in nature, is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or tax advice, or as advice on whether to buy or surrender any insurance products. Always consult an attorney or tax professional, or licensed insurance professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation, or insurance needs. © 2019 Adviser Investments, LLC. All Rights Reserved.