Was QE2 a Success? - Adviser Investments

Was QE2 a Success?

Markets Disembarking from QE2

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) made a big splash this week when Chairman Ben Bernanke held the first live press conference in the central bank’s 98-year history. Prior to the historic presser, the Fed announced it intended to wrap up its second “quantitative easing” program (QE2) by June 30.

If you are among those who normally associate the term “QE2” with a famous ocean liner, what follows is a quick primer on quantitative easing.

The FOMC has several tools at its disposal to manage interest rates, inflation, and the nation’s financial system. Normally, adjustments to the Federal Funds Rate are sufficient to steer interest rates and the economy in the Fed’s preferred direction. However, with the global economy on the brink of a depression in late 2008, the Fed took extraordinary steps to engineer what is known as “quantitative easing.” These measures were taken to reduce interest rates, increase liquidity, stimulate the global economy and (some argue) artificially prop up the stock market.

From December 2008 to March 2010, the Fed bought $1.7 trillion of U.S. Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities (QE1). This helped breathe life into the economy by lowering yields on fixed income securities, reducing interest rates for consumer loans and mortgages and encouraging investors to seek higher returns in the equity markets.

When high unemployment rates and sluggish economic growth persisted, the Fed set sail on a second round of quantitative easing (QE2). Between August 2010 and June 2011, the Fed will have purchased an additional $600 billion of U.S. Treasury bonds.

While QE2 will end in June, the Fed will continue to reinvest about $17 billion a month in proceeds from its portfolio of mortgage-backed securities to buy Treasury debt. The Fed also announced it plans to keep short-term interest rates at ultra-low levels–where they’ve been since late 2008–for an “extended period.”

Gauging QE2’s Success

With QE2 coming to a close, some are questioning whether the program was successful. If the overall goal was to prop up market confidence and support economic growth, the results were mixed to positive. The stock market has clearly made a remarkable recovery, and QE1 and QE2 provided ample liquidity to the markets. Money flowed into riskier assets, drawing investors away from more conservative fare such as Treasury bonds. As a result, U.S. Treasury bonds and the U.S. dollar both declined.

Now that the Federal Reserve has announced it will not commit to an extension of its quantitative easing program, what happens next? Some believe the removal of the Fed’s fiscal stimulus, combined with efforts to reduce government spending drastically, will weaken the U.S. economy and the stock market. Others contend the Fed’s extra stimulus will trigger runaway inflation and a sharp rise in interest rates.

The table below suggests the end of QE2 could lead to a market rotation similar to what we experienced last summer, when stocks fell and bonds and the U.S. dollar rallied.


Source: Adviser Investments    Note: “GSCI” stands for “Goldman Sachs Commodity Index.”

Investors who are tempted to dramatically increase their exposure to risk assets, especially commodities, may want to reconsider before moving too quickly. Although stocks and commodities benefitted greatly from increased liquidity during QE1 and QE2, both lost ground during the interim period last summer, while Treasury bonds and the U.S. dollar both gained.

What’s the best course for investors? As always, we prefer a balanced approach for our clients. While liquidity is only one factor determining market direction, other key factors include earnings, valuations, interest rates and sentiment. Therefore, we think that maintaining a balanced and diversified portfolio managed by some of the best mutual fund managers in the business is the best approach over the long haul.


About Adviser Investments
Adviser Investments operates as an independent, professional wealth management firm with expertise in Fidelity and Vanguard funds, actively managed mutual funds, ETFs, fixed-income investing, tactical strategies and financial planning. Our investment professionals focus on helping individual investors, trusts, foundations and institutions meet their investment goals. Our minimum account size is $350,000. For the fifth consecutive year, Adviser Investments was named to Barron’s list of the top 100 independent financial advisers nationwide and its list of the top advisory firms in Massachusetts in 2017. We have also been recognized on the Financial Times 300 Top Registered Investment Advisers list in 2014, 2015 and 2016.

For more information, please visit www.adviserinvestments.com or call 800-492-6868.

Disclaimer: This material is distributed for informational purposes only. The investment ideas and expressions of opinion may contain certain forward-looking statements and should not be viewed as recommendations, personal investment advice or considered an offer to buy or sell specific securities. Data and statistics contained in this report are obtained from what we believe to be reliable sources; however, their accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Our statements and opinions are subject to change without notice and should be considered only as part of a diversified portfolio. You may request a free copy of the firm’s Form ADV Part 2, which describes, among other items, risk factors, strategies, affiliations, services offered and fees charged.

Past performance is not an indication of future returns. The tax information contained herein is general in nature, is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. We do not provide legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation.

The Barron’s rankings consider factors such as assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, quality of practice and philanthropic work. This award does not consider client experience and is not indicative of future performance.

Editors at the Financial Times bestowed “elite” status on 300 firms in the U.S., as determined by assets under management, asset growth, longevity, compliance record, industry certifications and online accessibility.

© 2018 Adviser Investments, LLC. All Rights Reserved.