Vanguard to Liquidate Billion-Dollar Fund
When is a billion dollars not enough? In Vanguard’s case, it’s when a $962-million fund “has not gained broad acceptance among targeted investors.”
On Jan. 3, the Malvern, Pa. fund titan closed its 32-year-old Vanguard Convertible Securities fund to new investors and plans to liquidate all assets in March. (Note that this is not a fund we currently recommend to Adviser Investments clients.)
The move will close the book on the strategy that helped turn value investor Howard Marks and his Oaktree Capital Management into a household name in the investment management world. Oaktree has been the fund’s sole adviser since 1996, and it remains a well-respected firm. The fund’s closure came as a surprise to many. After all, it has a competitive record compared to its Morningstar convertible bondA financial instrument representing an IOU from the borrower to the lender. Bond issuers promise to pay bond holders a given amount of interest for a pre-determined amount of time until the loan is repaid in full (otherwise known as the maturity date). Bonds can have a fixed or floating interest rate. Fixed-rate bonds pay out a pre-determined amount of interest each year, while floating-rate bonds can pay higher or lower interest each year depending on prevailing market interest rates. peer group.
First, we’ll address why Vanguard said it was closing a fund that has “a capable advisor and prudent approach to managing convertible securities,” as described in its press release. Then we’ll explain what we think its actual rationale was.
Before that, though, a brief refresher on convertibles. These hybrid investment vehicles are structured like a bond and pay a periodic dividendA cash payment to investors who own stock in the company., but can be “converted” into a stockA financial instrument giving the holder a proportion of the ownership and earnings of a company. at a predetermined price. Thus, they have the qualities of both stocksA financial instrument giving the holder a proportion of the ownership and earnings of a company. and bondsA financial instrument representing an IOU from the borrower to the lender. Bond issuers promise to pay bond holders a given amount of interest for a pre-determined amount of time until the loan is repaid in full (otherwise known as the maturity date). Bonds can have a fixed or floating interest rate. Fixed-rate bonds pay out a pre-determined amount of interest each year, while floating-rate bonds can pay higher or lower interest each year depending on prevailing market interest rates..
Essentially, convertible securities can function as a lower-risk investment for investors who generally prefer stocks or a stock-like investment for conservative investors.
Now, back to the closure. One reason Vanguard gave for the liquidation is that “investors could achieve similar risk-return exposures and long-term returns by investing in a diversified, balanced portfolio of global stock and bond funds.” This doesn’t pass our smell test.
We decided to compare Convertible Securities to Vanguard’s LifeStrategy Growth—a diversified portfolio of global stocks and bonds with a similar riskThe probability that an investment will decline in value in the short term, along with the magnitude of that decline. Stocks are often considered riskier than bonds because they have a higher probability of losing money, and they tend to lose more than bonds when they do decline. level to Convertible Securities—since Oaktree assumed management of the convertible fund. Convertible Securities outperformed the global diversified portfolio over that time, doing so with less risk. The notion that one can invest in a diversified, balanced, global portfolio and achieve the same results might be right… but Vanguard hasn’t done so.
On top of that, we doubt that many (if any) of Convertible Securities’ shareholders own the fund as a substitute for a more broadly diversified portfolio. It seems more likely that they own the convertible fund as part of their overall allocation, which is how Vanguard imagined institutional investors would use it.
Vanguard’s second explanation for closing the fund rings truer to us. It was established with pension funds, endowments and corporate non-profit retirement plans in mind and failed to catch on among those potential customers. Convertible Securities “remains one of the smallest offerings in terms of net assets among Vanguard’s stock and balanced offerings.”
There’s the rub. It’s all about size and scale.
Convertible Securities is simply too small for Vanguard to continue to operate it efficiently. And assets have been moving the wrong direction for years. As recently as 2014, the fund was twice its current size. Since then, investors have pulled more than $1.3 billion. That’s some considerable shrinkage.
Managing a fund with $962 million in assets would be a huge success for most investment firms. But for Vanguard? With some $5 trillion in assets and 171 other mutual funds and exchange-traded fundsA type of security which allows investors to indirectly invest in an underlying basket of financial instruments (these may include stocks, bonds, commodities or other types of instruments). Shares in an ETF are publicly traded on an exchange, and the price of an ETF’s shares will fluctuate throughout the trading day (traditional mutual funds trade only once a day). For example, one popular ETF tracks the companies in the S&P 500, so buying a share of the ETF gets an investor exposure to all 500 companies in the index. to administer, it’s like keeping track of pocket change.
The move also caused us to wonder about the long-term prospects of Vanguard’s other funds with less than $1 billion. Most in that category are relatively new and can probably expect plenty of runway to gather assets. One possible candidate for closure and absorption into another fund might be the Capital Value fund. It has “only” $800 million in assets, an iffy track record and a history of manager changes. That’d be an easy one to fold into Vanguard’s Windsor fund, given that the same manager works on both.
As for Convertible Securities, you’re out of luck. Existing shareholders can purchase additional shares until March 6, when it will be closed to new investments—but we’re not sure we see the point in adding money, since Vanguard is planning to turn around, sell off the portfolio holdings and return the proceeds to shareholders starting March 19. Any gains made in that short period will be taxable as income. After that, former investors will have a choice—find another convertible securities fund elsewhere, reinvest in one of Vanguard’s other options or find another use for their money.
So, rest in peace, Convertible Securities. The fund giant lumbers on…
This material is distributed for informational purposes only. The investment ideas and expressions of opinion may contain certain forward-looking statements and should not be viewed as recommendations, personal investment advice or considered an offer to buy or sell specific securities. The views expressed in this update are subject to change at any time. Mutual funds and exchange-traded funds mentioned herein are not necessarily held in client portfolios. Data and statistics contained in this report are obtained from what we believe to be reliable sources; however, their accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.
Our statements and opinions are subject to change without notice and should be considered only as part of a diversified portfolio. You may request a free copy of the firm’s Form ADV Part 2A, which describes, among other items, risk factors, strategies, affiliations, services offered and fees charged.
Past performance is not an indication of future returns. The tax information contained herein is general in nature, is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. We do not provide legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation.
The Barron’s rankings consider factors such as assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, quality of practice and philanthropic work. This award does not consider client experience and is not indicative of future performance.
Editors at the Financial Times bestowed “elite” status on 300 firms in the U.S., as determined by assets under management, asset growth, longevity, compliance record, industry certifications and online accessibility.
© 2019 Adviser Investments, LLC. All Rights Reserved