Rebalance the Smart Way

The Rebalancing Gauntlet

In our last Adviser Fund Update, we took a look at what Vanguard and Fidelity recommend when it comes to rebalancing, with both firms feeling that investors should tweak their portfolios every time a position moves 5-10% off of their target allocation or otherwise on a semiannual or annual basis. When we ran our own numbers, we found that over two-plus decades, there was little difference in return between periodically rebalanced portfolios and a portfolio that was never rebalanced. For all of the details, please take a look at our Adviser Fund Update archives by directing your browser to www.AdviserInvestments.com/research/fund-updates and clicking on the update posted on January 7th.

After running the numbers last time, this week we thought we would point out some of the other issues that one needs to consider when developing a rebalancing strategy.

Trading Comes with Costs

There is one very strong argument against becoming a rebalancing fanatic, and that’s cost. When conducting our analysis two weeks ago, we assumed that all distributions were reinvested along the way, and did not factor in transaction fees or taxes on realized gains from trades. But these are both very important issues to consider when thinking about a rebalancing strategy.

If you choose to rebalance annually or even more frequently in a taxable portfolio, carefully review how the various transactions you’ll need to make will affect your tax return as well as any fees you might incur–do funds in your portfolio have front- or back-end loads or short-term trading fees? Are you buying into a fund paying a distribution? (While Vanguard’s Total International Index pays distributions annually, 500 Index pays out quarterly.) Will the sale of a fund create a taxable gain? These are all questions you should be asking yourself when developing a rebalancing strategy. (Even though taxes won’t be an issue if you’re rebalancing your IRAA type of account in which funds can be saved and invested without being subject to tax until the account holder reaches retirement age., 401(k) or any other tax-free account, you still should consider fees and expenses from trades.)

However, there are more ways to rebalance than just buying and selling out of the funds in your portfolio on a fixed schedule. One of the simplest, and one we’ve recommended for years, is to re-direct distributions to or make new investments in the under-allocated funds in a portfolio. Or if you’re at the point where you’re drawing on the portfolio for income, take withdrawals out of your winners to reduce their allocation (this of course will generate its own tax bill, but of course you can’t avoid taxes forever if you’re drawing down your account). These kinds of moves will be the most effective in keeping taxes and expenses down when compared to making numerous trades over the course of a year.

Remove Emotion from the Equation

There’s another issue at stake in rebalancing that often gets overlooked, and that’s the human factor. It’s easy enough to calmly discuss rebalancing a hypothetical portfolio, but when it comes to reality, many investors may find the idea counterintuitive, as it requires you to reward the losers in your portfolio with more money while reducing your exposure to the proven winners.

If you have a fund in your portfolio that’s been outperforming month after month, you’re probably not going to want to sell it to invest more in a fund that’s been losing you money. But the standard theory of rebalancing requires that you do exactly that, and not just once, but over and over and over. As former Vanguard Chairman Jack Brennan has said, “If you are going to rebalance, you have to be absolutely clinical, or you are better off not doing it.” We share this view.

Of course you could take the more laidback route and rarely rebalance–if at all–so long as you have a tolerance for the increased volatilityA measure of how large the changes in an asset’s price are. The more volatile an asset, the more likely that its price will experience sharp rises and steep drops over time. The more volatile an asset is, the riskier it is to invest in. that is part of an “unbalanced” portfolio. And when you figure the tax bill on frequent trades, you could come out substantially ahead. As illustrated by our analysis, from a returns standpoint, going with the flow isn’t that bad of an idea.

Several more things to consider: If you do choose to rebalance on a set schedule, is your target allocation still appropriate–do you still have the same investment goals as when you started? Over the two-plus decade period such as the one we looked at last time, your allocation might need a change, requiring even more buying and selling. Do you have a lower or higher tolerance for riskThe probability that an investment will decline in value in the short term, along with the magnitude of that decline. Stocks are often considered riskier than bonds because they have a higher probability of losing money, and they tend to lose more than bonds when they do decline.? Just because you picked a certain allocation at one point doesn’t mean that it suits your purposes now. Are you prepared for the headaches and tax implications of making multiple trades per year? While many firms allow you to make trades online, you still open yourself up to having to review more paperwork, track all of the changes to make sure there weren’t any errors (on your part or the fund company’s) and fill out extra lines on your tax return for every capital gain realized. This seems like a lot of extra hassle to us for a reduction in risk and in total return.

So is rebalancing necessary? Even though the media or your fund company may have you think so, when you look at the evidence–even after a three-year stretch as topsy-turvy as 2008-2010–there is little benefit when it comes to the portfolio’s returns, and only some benefit when you think about risk. (And this assumes no tax consequences.) Our recommendation would be to make a few trades over the course of several years, as we do for our clients, as opposed to being overly active each year with potentially costly trades that are not going to improve your returns. Of course, if rebalancing frequently gives you peace of mind and you’re willing to be clinical about it, your portfolio will not suffer too much for it either.

About Adviser Investments
Adviser Investments operates as an independent, professional wealth management firm with expertise in Fidelity and Vanguard funds, actively managed mutual funds, ETFsA type of security which allows investors to indirectly invest in an underlying basket of financial instruments (these may include stocks, bonds, commodities or other types of instruments). Shares in an ETF are publicly traded on an exchange, and the price of an ETF’s shares will fluctuate throughout the trading day (traditional mutual funds trade only once a day). For example, one popular ETF tracks the companies in the S&P 500, so buying a share of the ETF gets an investor exposure to all 500 companies in the index., fixed-income investing, tactical strategies and financial planning. Our investment professionals focus on helping individual investors, trustsA legal document that functions as an instruction manual to how you want your money managed and spent in your later years as well as how your assets should be distributed after your death. Assets placed in a trust are generally safe from creditors and can be sold by the trustee in short order, avoiding the lengthy and costly probate process., foundations and institutions meet their investment goals. Our minimum account size is $350,000. For the fifth consecutive year, Adviser Investments was named to Barron’s list of the top 100 independent financial advisers nationwide and its list of the top advisory firms in Massachusetts in 2017. We have also been recognized on the Financial Times 300 Top Registered Investment Advisers list in 2014, 2015 and 2016.

For more information, please visit www.adviserinvestments.com or call 800-492-6868.

Disclaimer: This material is distributed for informational purposes only. The investment ideas and expressions of opinion may contain certain forward-looking statements and should not be viewed as recommendations, personal investment advice or considered an offer to buy or sell specific securities. Data and statistics contained in this report are obtained from what we believe to be reliable sources; however, their accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Our statements and opinions are subject to change without notice and should be considered only as part of a diversified portfolio. You may request a free copy of the firm’s Form ADV Part 2, which describes, among other items, risk factors, strategies, affiliations, services offered and fees charged.

Past performance is not an indication of future returns. The tax information contained herein is general in nature, is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. We do not provide legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation.

The Barron’s rankings consider factors such as assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, quality of practice and philanthropic work. This award does not consider client experience and is not indicative of future performance.

Editors at the Financial Times bestowed “elite” status on 300 firms in the U.S., as determined by assets under management, asset growth, longevity, compliance record, industry certifications and online accessibility.

© 2018 Adviser Investments, LLC. All Rights Reserved.